Methodology Preview:Functional families and class counts are modeled to the City of Keene's 223 positions per RFP 02-26-21 + Addendum #1. Salary, benefit, and pension figures shown here are illustrative — production data populated from Keene HRIS, NHRS Group I/II, NH HealthTrust, and NE peer-municipality adopted schedules at engagement award.

Methodology · 6-Phase Project Plan

August 2026 – March 2027 · 8-month engagement, calibrated to the City's FY 2028 budget cycle prep

The RFP §3 Scope of Services is explicit: 223 positions, 6 bargaining units (plus non-bargaining), comprehensive written report, salary survey + methodology, recommended pay ranges, cost modeling, and a Council presentation. Our six-phase methodology maps directly to RFP §3.A – §3.F and incorporates Addendum #1's public-safety scope add-back. Every phase below cites the specific RFP requirement it satisfies.

  1. 01

    August 2026

    3 weeks

    Discovery + 2023 Evergreen baseline reconciliation

    Maps to: RFP §3.A Project Planning and Data Collection

    Activities

    • ▸Kickoff with Asst City Manager / HR Director (Beth Fox), City Manager, Finance Director — confirm scope, dedicated personnel, deliverable cadence
    • ▸Audit & gap-analyze the 2023 Evergreen Solutions baseline study — what landed, what stuck in CBAs, what was rejected by City Council, what's stale 2.5 years later
    • ▸Pull authoritative source data: 223 current job descriptions, FY 2026 Adopted Budget personnel schedule, current pay schedule, FLSA designations, NHRS Group I/II designations per incumbent
    • ▸Initial 6-bargaining-unit cross-walk: KPOA, PD Supervisors, Professional Firefighters, FD Supervisors, AFSCME/DPW, Dispatch + 42 non-bargaining
    • ▸Schedule department-head briefings (16 departments) and employee briefings (one per BU)
    • ▸Stand up secured project folder + portal credentials for HR team

    Deliverables

    • ◆Kickoff Memo
    • ◆Evergreen 2023 Baseline Reconciliation Brief
    • ◆Stakeholder Engagement Plan
    • ◆Data Intake Schedule
    • ◆Project Risk Register v1
  2. 02

    September – October 2026

    8 weeks

    New England market analysis — 17 peer municipalities

    Maps to: RFP §3.B Market Analysis

    Activities

    • ▸17 NE peer municipalities surveyed — NH primary (Portsmouth, Concord, Dover, Nashua, Manchester, Lebanon, Claremont, Laconia, Rochester, Berlin, Franklin) plus VT, MA, ME peers (Brattleboro, Burlington, Rutland, Greenfield, Northampton, Bangor, Auburn)
    • ▸Each comparator's adopted FY 2026 / 2027 pay schedule pulled (authoritative public records)
    • ▸NH PELRB-filed CBAs cross-referenced for confirmed top-step and step-progression rules
    • ▸Targeted private-sector benchmark — Cheshire Medical, Keene State College, C&S Wholesale Grocers, Markem-Imaje cluster pull for non-public-sector comparable roles
    • ▸NH Local Government Center (LGC) wage data cross-reference for statewide percentile
    • ▸Keene-equivalent role mapping (~210+ benchmark matches anticipated; flagged where unique)
    • ▸Total compensation benefits comparison: NH HealthTrust vs alternate carriers, NHRS Group I/II/Fire pension cost-of-employment overlay

    Deliverables

    • ◆Comparator Database (Excel)
    • ◆Market Position Report
    • ◆Compression Analysis Brief
    • ◆Total-Comp Equivalency Memo
    • ◆Statewide Percentile Cross-Reference
  3. 03

    November 2026

    4 weeks

    Internal equity diagnostic across 6 BUs + non-bargaining

    Maps to: RFP §3.C Internal Equity Review

    Activities

    • ▸Position-level equity analysis across all 6 bargaining units AND the 42 non-bargaining management/exempt roles
    • ▸AI-drafted equity analysis generated for each of 223 classes (using HSG's AI/Expert Reconciliation Methodology)
    • ▸Each AI-drafted finding reconciled by Certified Job Evaluator (Gilda Weech-House) against JD, BU contract, NH peer-municipality structures, and DOL O*NET
    • ▸Compression and inequity diagnostics — within-BU, cross-BU, and BU vs non-bargaining
    • ▸Distinct-classification audit — examples where similar titles do materially different work, handled by sub-classification design
    • ▸Public safety total-comp analysis specifically broken out per Addendum #1: Group II Police vs Group II Fire pension overlay, certification differentials, FTO/K9/SRO assignment pay

    Deliverables

    • ◆Internal Equity Findings Brief
    • ◆6-BU Cross-Walk Map
    • ◆Compression Remediation Plan
    • ◆AI/Expert Reconciliation Log
    • ◆Public-Safety Equity Deep-Dive
  4. 04

    December 2026

    4 weeks (incl. on-site mid-point review)

    Classification review — 223 job descriptions

    Maps to: RFP §3.D Classification Review

    Activities

    • ▸All 223 current JDs reviewed against actual work, FLSA, and BU contract scope
    • ▸Reclassification recommendations where appropriate — grade up/down, title alignment, new class creation, retirement of obsolete titles
    • ▸Career-ladder & promotional-progression mapping — within each functional family + across BUs
    • ▸BU/CBA impact analysis — what reclassifications require negotiated MOU vs administrative implementation
    • ▸On-site mid-point review at City Hall (Jelani + Gilda) — work session with HR team to validate before final report
    • ▸Department-Head analytic-tier alignment: 12 Department Heads anchored against NH peer-city Manager/Director/Chief ranges

    Deliverables

    • ◆Recommended Classification Catalog (223 classes)
    • ◆Reclassification Action List (tiered: admin / MOU / CBA)
    • ◆Career Ladder Map
    • ◆On-site Mid-Point Review Memo
  5. 05

    January – February 2027

    6 weeks

    Pay structure design + cost modeling (phased vs immediate)

    Maps to: RFP §3.E Compensation Structure Evaluation

    Activities

    • ▸Pay range design — minimum, midpoint, maximum for each grade across all 6 BUs + non-bargaining management
    • ▸Phased vs immediate implementation cost scenarios — modeled per BU and rolled to total City cost
    • ▸NHRS Group I (12.83%) / Group II Police (33.88%) / Group II Fire (32.91%) employer cost rollups
    • ▸HealthTrust premium-share projection at illustrative + scenario rates
    • ▸BU-specific implementation guidance (which BUs need MOU vs which can administer)
    • ▸New-hire starting-pay guidelines + step-progression recommendations
    • ▸Sustainable framework recommendation — annual market refresh process for HR Director to maintain

    Deliverables

    • ◆Recommended Pay Schedule v1 (all BUs)
    • ◆Cost Impact Model (Excel — phased vs immediate)
    • ◆Implementation Roadmap (BU-by-BU)
    • ◆Annual Refresh Process Memo
  6. 06

    March 2027

    3 weeks (incl. on-site Council presentation)

    Final delivery, City Council presentation, & 30-day Q&A window

    Maps to: RFP §3.F Deliverables

    Activities

    • ▸Comprehensive final report — full study + each grade and class before/after with reasons
    • ▸Salary survey results and methodology fully documented
    • ▸Cost modeling for recommended changes (all scenarios)
    • ▸Presentation of findings to City Manager + Council in Keene Council Chambers — pre-rehearsed with HR Director (on-site, Jelani + Gilda)
    • ▸30-day implementation Q&A window (March – April 2027) — included in firm fixed price
    • ▸Final delivery target: March 2027, calibrated to City's FY 2028 budget cycle prep

    Deliverables

    • ◆Final Report (PDF + DOCX)
    • ◆Salary Survey Methodology & Results
    • ◆Cost Modeling Workbook
    • ◆Council Presentation Deck
    • ◆30-Day Implementation Q&A Support

On-Time Delivery Commitment

Final delivery by end of March 2027 — calibrated to FY 2028 budget cycle prep.

The Keene RFP §3.F asks for a comprehensive report with cost modeling and Council presentation; it does not name a date the way some procurement timetables do. We commit to end-of-March 2027 because that is when the City Manager and Finance Director need our recommendations to build FY 2028 around them. Every phase above carries a hard buffer to absorb data-availability slippage from peer municipalities or HRIS pull delays without compressing the final review window. The 30-day implementation Q&A window after delivery is included in our firm fixed price — we don't leave the City alone with the report when questions surface during budget build.